Thank you for your reply. I grabbed the migration scripts from http://www.padl.com/download/ because I wanted to avoid installing openldap when all I needed was the scripts. Looking at the source the kerberosSecurityObject is inserted as long as there is a default realm, though the extended schema does cause a problem with mail related values (see below). It sounds like what I was missing is the fact that editing the migration scripts is expected. I was under the impression that if my migration didn't work it was a mistake I had made. After commenting out the following items in the password_migration script my admin user finally added: - mailRoutingAddress - mailHost - inetLocalMailRecipient - kerberosSecurityObject - krbName Is not having these in my schema common/normal? Thanks, -Mont* * On 3/24/06, Craig White <craigwhite at azapple.com> wrote: > > On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 10:26 -0800, Mont Rothstein wrote: > > A suggestion was made that I should add the contents of my > > sambaAdmin.ldif file to this post. They are below. > > > > The kerberosSecurityObject isn't in my schema, so thus the error. But > > why did migrate_password.pl put that in my ldif? Is there a config > > option somewhere that should be switched to disable Kerberos or do I > > just need to manually edit the ldif and delete the offending line? > > > > Thanks, > > -Mont > > > > > > dn: uid=Administrator,ou=People,dc=forayadams,dc=foray,dc=com > > uid: Administrator > > cn: Samba Admin > > givenName: Samba > > sn: Admin > > mail: Administrator at forayadams.foray.com > > mailRoutingAddress: Administrator at mail.forayadams.foray.com > > mailHost: mail.forayadams.foray.com > > objectClass: inetLocalMailRecipient > > objectClass: person > > objectClass: organizationalPerson > > objectClass: inetOrgPerson > > objectClass: posixAccount > > objectClass: top > > objectClass: kerberosSecurityObject > > userPassword: {crypt}x > > krbName: Administrator at FORAYADAMS.FORAY.COM > > loginShell: /bin/bash > > uidNumber: 0 > > gidNumber: 0 > > homeDirectory: /root > > gecos: Samba Admin > ---- > the option of course is yours. > > If you read through the source within the padl migration scripts (I'm > assuming that you used the ones installed by openldap-server package > from the distribution, you will probably notice how and why it is put > there...presumably because you have chosen to use an extended schema. > > I think the object is to test, tune, test, tune until you get what you > want from the migration scripts. > > I suspect the reasons no one else answered this question was that the > source isn't part of FDS, the DSA setup will be as you design it to be > and the source is lightweight and should be simple enough to comprehend > and adjust as needed. > > Craig > > -- > Fedora-directory-users mailing list > Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20060327/517e5f5a/attachment.html
