Fran?ois Beretti wrote: >Sorry for my late answer. > >When binding with cn=Directory Manager, the user does not exist. So >the existance of the entry does not seem to be always requiered, does >it ? > > That user is special, and there is lots of code in the server to handle this special case. The other instance is when using pass through auth or chaining - the user is remote. >Fran?ois > >2006/2/23, David Boreham <david_list at boreham.org>: > > >>This would be a new feature. You'd need to write code to >>implement it (or someone would). Problem is that there are >>a bunch of places in the code where the existance of an >>entry with the bind identity is assumed. So it wouldn't be >>quite as simple as taking the cert DN and copying it into >>the bind DN for the session. >> >> >>-- >>Fedora-directory-users mailing list >>Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com >>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users >> >> >> > >-- >Fedora-directory-users mailing list >Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com >https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3178 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20060301/dd9340b0/attachment.bin
