New filesystem layout for directory server and admin server files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 30 Jun 2006, John Dennis wrote:

| On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 13:59 -0600, Richard Megginson wrote:
| > In order to be more linux friendly, we are currently considering 
| > changing the layout from having everything under /opt/fedora-ds to 
| > putting files in their FHS specific paths.  The details are here - 
| > http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/wiki/FHS_Packaging
| > 
| > I've heard some pretty strong opinions for both moving to this and 
| > sticking to the current packaging model.  I'd like to open this debate 
| > up to the wider audience.
| 
| I think it's a good idea to move to an FHS layout, not only will this
| make directory server fit in with the rest of our packages but it will
| also aid in SELinux policy which makes strong assumptions about location
| in FHS directories.

I'm on the fence about this.  I think you have good points.  I also see
where mj at sci.fi is coming from, too.  Fedora DS isn't the only piece of
software that is a bundle unto itself.  Apache Tomcat comes to mind.
As for an SELinux policy, one can be created that fits the current directory
and file layout.  If a policy is going to be created, I would think that
it would be just as easy (or difficult) to create one for an FHS layout
as it would be for the current layout.
You could always make a separate, FHS-specific package available and see
what people think.  If the votes are high enough in support of the new
layout then you could make a permanent switch.  The only thing I would
suggest, assuming you decide to roll out a package for this layout, is
to ensure directory naming consistency.  I see that you've proposed to have
an /etc/fedora-ds directory.  However, for the 'fds-admin' package you
also have an /etc/fds directory.  You should pick either '/etc/fedora-ds'
or '/etc/fds' and stick with it.  Having a fragmented naming scheme would
defeat part of the purpose of adopting a new layout.


Michael


-- 
/* BEGIN SIG
 *
 * "Most of us, when all is said and done, like what
 *  we like and make up reasons for it afterwards."
 *  -- Soren F. Petersen
 *
 *-----------------------------
 * Michael Chang
 * miranda [at] syndetic [dot] org
 * AIM: Solempathe
 * http://www.syndetic.org/
 */




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora QA]     [Fedora Triage]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Apps]     [Maemo Users]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Maemo Users]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux