Jeff Gamsby wrote: > > >>> >> I think that you are getting hung up on a display issue. The >> supplier is just listed as a string to identify the instance. The >> synchronization is always[*] initiated from the FDS side, so as long >> as you are trying to connect to AD via SSL, everything will be >> encrypted. >> >> [*] The one exception to this is the PassSync service installed on >> the windows side. You need to configure this to connect to FDS over >> the SSL port. >> >> -NGK >> > OK, but when I set it up this way and I check the replication logs, I > see the suppliers port, and it's listed as 389. When configuring > PassSync, I do put it in secure mode with the secure port. So it > doesn't matter, since the PassSync config is set to SSL, and the FDS > to AD has to be SSL, then that 389 is just an identifier? Yes. > > Jeff > > -- > Fedora-directory-users mailing list > Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3178 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20060620/1f0c0096/attachment.bin
