Strange problem -- LDAP server hosed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mike Mueller wrote:
> Hey guys... I hope I can provide sufficient detail to get a clue here, 
> but I don't have much info about what's happening yet.
>
> We are using Fedora DS v1.0.2, and the client is a Java application 
> using JNDI.  The client is doing some tests that involve manipulating 
> the schema, adding/removing attributes, adding/modifying/removing 
> object classes.  During this process, objects of these types are 
> created in the directory, too.
>
> What's happening is that it seems like objects with duplicate names 
> are being created, i.e. cn=object1 is created twice.  The second time 
> it gets created, its name is nsuniqueid=<alphanumeric string>.  I'm 
> not sure how this could happen, because typically if you tried to 
> create a duplicate entry, you'd get a 
> javax.naming.directory.NameAlreadyBoundException.
Are you are using multi-master replication?  It sounds like these 
entries you are seeing are replication conflict entries.  You can read 
about dealing with them in the Administrator's Guide.  Here is a link to 
the relevant section:

    
http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/dir-server/ag/7.1/replicat.html#1106141
>
> What's worse, I can't delete any of these entries.  When I try to, it 
> says "Operation not allowed on nonleaf" (doing this via the graphical 
> console), although the object in question is a leaf.  Typically, even 
> for nonleafs, the GUI would recursively delete everything.
What happens when you try to delete the entry with ldapdelete?  Also, 
did you verify that the entry is indeed a leaf entry with ldapsearch as 
"cn=directory manager"?

-NGK
>
> The only fix for this problem was to delete the underlying database 
> behind the root suffix, and recreate it fresh.  Obviously this is a 
> serious problem, in a production environment, we can't afford to be 
> doing something like this.  This has happened on two of our servers 
> now, and on the second one, I'm unable to even delete the database!  
> It got halfway through, and then sits there hanging.  That server is 
> completely out of commision now.
>
> Any information would be appreciated!!
>
> Mike
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> --
> Fedora-directory-users mailing list
> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>   

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3241 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20060707/305cc57d/attachment.bin 


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora QA]     [Fedora Triage]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Apps]     [Maemo Users]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Maemo Users]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux