On 1/25/06, Les Mikesell <les at futuresource.com> wrote: > Is anyone following the Active Directory services in samba4 > (http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/software/soa/New_Samba_targets_Active_Directory/0,2000061733,39234687,00.htm) > enough to comment on how it would compare to FDS for network > authentication purposes? > > -- > Les Mikesell > lesmikesell at gmail.com > > > -- > Fedora-directory-users mailing list > Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > Well at least I think you could still use FDS as a meta directory server that has to play with a M$ ADS. On the other hand SMB 4 features a new mini ldap inside, let alone the kerberos. So ther are chances you could play that way too. Please list correct me if I am stupid.;-) -- ########################################3 Zaharioudakis Nikos mob: +30 6947204063 A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
