Please create a bug and attach your (zipped) gibberish file. Bad schema should be logged (at least) - assuming the gibberish didn't actually form a valid schema component some how. Brian Rudy wrote: > I did some additional digging and realized that somehow I did > something incorrectly while converting the samba.schema file to > 61samba.ldif. My 61samba.ldif was over 176kb (the latter part being > filled with binary gibberish), but should have been ~13k if things had > completed properly :P Strangely enough, I didn't see any errors in the > slapd logs about being unable to load the schema file... > > > Brian Rudy wrote: > >> Pete Rowley wrote: >> >>> Brian Rudy wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> I double checked >>>> /opt/fedora-ds/slapd-<server>/config/schema/61samba.ldif created in >>>> the initial setup steps and was unable to find a sambaUnixIDPool >>>> objectclass, but did see a sambaUnixIdPool. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> These two values /should/ be equivalent. >>> >>>> Any idea of what might be happening here? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Did you restart the server after you initially added the new schema >>> files? >> >> >> >> I did indeed. It almost looks like 61samba.ldif isn't being used for >> some reason... >> >> >> >> -- >> Fedora-directory-users mailing list >> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > > > > -- > Fedora-directory-users mailing list > Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users -- Pete -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3241 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20060109/2a5788ef/attachment.bin
