Frits Hoogland wrote: > Same here, 'reasonable' usage, constant leaking. > We are using multimaster replication. > > Haven't had any responses, though. Are you guys using SSL? What OS version? I'm assuming you are using FDS 1.0.2. > > frits > > On 8/21/06, * Jason Russler* <jrussler at helix.nih.gov > <mailto:jrussler at helix.nih.gov>> wrote: > > I've seen one recent mention on this list about leaks in the directory > server but I have a ns-slapd process that grows by dozens of > megabytes a > day. At least once a week I restart the directory server after it > eats > up ~90% of the system memory. Right now it's a 1.2G process and > it sure > isn't cached data because there are not that many entries in this > thing. I don't recall the issue being this extreme when I first > set it > up. Cold the leak be associated with replication or some other > subsystem not active in a fresh install? > -- > Jason Russler > Helix Systems, NIH, DHHS > > -- > Fedora-directory-users mailing list > Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > <mailto:Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > -- > Fedora-directory-users mailing list > Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3178 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20060821/1794814c/attachment.bin
