Jason Russler wrote: > Crud - I was looking at the wrong logs.... At any rate here's what I > see in the admin server's error logs: > > > [Mon Apr 24 15:28:34 2006] [notice] child pid 17051 exit signal > Segmentation fault (11) > [Mon Apr 24 15:28:36 2006] [notice] [client x.x.x.x] > admserv_host_ip_check: ap_get_remote_host could not resolve x.x.x.x > [Mon Apr 24 15:28:37 2006] [notice] child pid 17151 exit signal > Segmentation fault (11) > [Mon Apr 24 15:28:38 2006] [notice] [client x.x.x.x] > admserv_host_ip_check: ap_get_remote_host could not resolve x.x.x.x > [Mon Apr 24 15:28:39 2006] [notice] child pid 17226 exit signal > Segmentation fault (11) > [Mon Apr 24 15:28:40 2006] [notice] [client x.x.x.x] > admserv_host_ip_check: ap_get_remote_host could not resolve x.x.x.x > [Mon Apr 24 15:28:41 2006] [notice] child pid 17298 exit signal > Segmentation fault (11) > [Mon Apr 24 15:28:42 2006] [notice] [client x.x.x.x] > admserv_host_ip_check: ap_get_remote_host could not resolve x.x.x.x > [Mon Apr 24 15:28:43 2006] [notice] child pid 17374 exit signal > Segmentation fault (11) Hmm - that's not good at all. What OS is this? You mentioned that you have an FC5 system running fine. Is this from just the initial click on the DS Gateway link from the main admin server page? Or do you actually get into the DS Gateway app? > ... > > Where x.x.x.x is the ip of the client system (accessing the admin > server via a web browser). "% host x.x.x.x" executed on the server > system returns the correct host name for the remote client. Now, if I > turn off SSL for the admin server I get similar entries: > > ... > [Mon Apr 24 16:01:27 2006] [notice] [client x.x.x.x] > admserv_host_ip_check: ap_get_remote_host could not resolve x.x.x.x, > referer: > http://this.here.host:49657/clients/dsgw/bin/csearch?context=dsgw&file=base > > [Mon Apr 24 16:01:27 2006] [notice] [client x.x.x.x] > admserv_host_ip_check: ap_get_remote_host could not resolve x.x.x.x, > referer: > http://this.here.host:49657/clients/dsgw/bin/csearch?context=dsgw&file=attr > > [Mon Apr 24 16:01:27 2006] [notice] [client x.x.x.x] > admserv_host_ip_check: ap_get_remote_host could not resolve x.x.x.x, > referer: > http://this.here.host:49657/clients/dsgw/bin/csearch?context=dsgw&file=match > > [Mon Apr 24 16:01:27 2006] [notice] [client x.x.x.x] > admserv_host_ip_check: ap_get_remote_host could not resolve x.x.x.x, > referer: > http://this.here.host:49657/clients/dsgw/bin/csearch?context=dsgw&file=string > > ... > > This is now without the segfault following every entry. Everything > works fine, just over a unencrypted connection. > > The system in question here is on 3 networks and is on one of our > higher-end administrative systems (and the backup system when I get > this one working). The /etc/hosts file entry for the system's "real" > external IP address is not correct - the actual DNS name is associated > with a private internal interface - for a pile of reasons that I won't > go into. However DNS ("% host [system's full name]") resolves the > system's real external IP address just fine. My wild guess is that > the discrepancy between the hosts file and DNS is causing trouble when > using SSL? But it is filling the error logs with or without SSL > enabled. I have a stand-alone test system with one interface (running > FC5) that works just fine over SSL - sucks for me that I have to get > it working on the more complicated system. > > -Jason > > > > > Rob Crittenden wrote: >> Jason Russler wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> After sorting out my SSL problems for the admin server I've run into >>> an odd issue. The Directory server gateway runs very slowly and >>> misses page items (images, form fields, etc): the "Authentication" >>> tab, for instance, shows only the top menu bar and nothing else - >>> the forms are left out. "Advanced Search" shows only the drop-down >>> for "is, is not etc...". If I turn SSL off for the admin server and >>> restart it, things go back to working great. Turn it on, and it >>> slows and breaks again. Not sure what could cause this. The system >>> is REH 3 with FDS 1.0.2. Anyone else see this behavior? >>> -Jason >> >> Can you look in /opt/fedora-ds/admin-serv/logs/errors? The problem is >> likely being logged there. >> >> rob >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> -- >> Fedora-directory-users mailing list >> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users >> > > -- > Fedora-directory-users mailing list > Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3178 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20060424/0d5513f0/attachment.bin
