> For some reason, I just assumed that they would be unsigned integers. That would make more sense to me too... since uid numbers can't be negative (as far as I know)? oh well :) mj at sci.fi wrote: >> http://kbase.redhat.com/faq/FAQ_80_6231.shtm > > Aha, they are stored as signed integers, so the actual number is in > the 2 billion range... For some reason, I just assumed that they would > be unsigned integers. > > Thanks for the pointer! > > -- > mike > > -- > Fedora-directory-users mailing list > Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users >
