DeMarco, Dennis wrote: > Under the performance tab, there is an idle timeout. Does anyone have > any recommendations on this? I am not sure keeping it a 0 is good > practice. You wouldn?t want to keep idle connections open and run out > of file descriptors correct? Would 30 seconds seem reasonable? > It depends on your network. Are all of your clients going to be accessing the directory server via fast (100MB or 1GB) network connections? If so, then you could probably drop the idle timeout down to a few seconds (or lower). But if you have older networks or WAN/Dialup connections, you may have to make it longer. > Idle timeout. The time (in seconds) the server maintains an idle > connection before terminating the connection. A value of 0 indicates > no limit. > > Thanks, > > Dennis > > *This message (including any attachments) contains confidential > information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is > protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should > delete this message. Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this > message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.* > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >-- >Fedora-directory-users mailing list >Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com >https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3178 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20060418/d8e80b20/attachment.bin
