When tuning FDS on a Solaris machine, I've heard two different suggestions about nsslapd-dbcachesize: 1. Decrease nsslapd-dbcachesize, and instead rely on Solaris' built-in filesystem cache which performs better. 2. Tune nsslapd-dbcachesize up to a value that is at least as large as the size of your backend LDBM database. To know for sure which works best in my case, I'll need to test both of course. But, does anyone have any thoughts or prior experience on which of the above options performs better? Thanks a lot, -- George