Mike Jackson wrote: > Jackson, Jon wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I've been trying to get ahold of the 1.0.2 binaries for FC4, but the >> link is dead (and is dead for FC3/RHEL4, FC2/RHEL3). Is there another >> place to get these? I've done some googling and can't seem to locate a >> mirror. And I can't seem to find a site maintainer's email address, so >> I'm reaching out to the users. How are you obtaining binaries? >> >> How finicky is the build process, If I were to build from the sources? >> Do the sources include the recently released tools? > > > > I built 1.0 from source with dsbuild, on my RHEL4 laptop, and it > worked for me (tm). The admin console is really fast now with apache, > compared to how it performed with the previous backend ns-httpd. I > mean to say that it is a major performance improvement. This is the > first time IMO that the admin console is actually "usable". Note that 1.0 is not yet fully baked - that's why we dropped the download links. So if it works for you, that's great. If not, we'd really like to find out how/where it doesn't work. > > I ran into one small hiccup while the admin server was building, > where it refused to build with jdk1.5.0. What problems did you see? > Dropping back to 1.4.2 solved the problem. Actually, I keep both of > them in /usr/java, and just move the jdk symlink back and forth as > needed. JAVA_HOME is set to /usr/java/jdk. > > Note that you need httpd and httpd-devel packages on a RHEL/FC > machine before 1.0 will build with dsbuild, since apxs is required for > building mod_restart. > > BR, > -- > mike > > -- > Fedora-directory-users mailing list > Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3312 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20051121/6308f1c9/attachment.bin
