Gerald Richter wrote: > I tried it out and here is the result (everything is after startup and > without any load or work. The numbers are the virtual memory that ps shows): > > - default configuration ~ 122MB > > - reduce db cache from 10MB to 1 MB ~ 113MB > > - reduce number of threads from 30 to 3 ~ 57MB > > - disable unneeded plugins ~ 55MB > > BTW This is still a factor of 5 higher than OpenLdap, which takes about 10MB And OpenLDAP is still ~100 times bigger than: http://www.fefe.de/tinyldap/ - 11k > From what you wrote and from what I read and what my tests shows: It really > seems that FDS is good for huge databases with high load, but not for the > small ones with limited computer resources. That is not IMO a logical assumption or something which can be proven, as you have not defined "huge", "small ones", or "limited computer resources". BR, -- mike
